Because they can't be defended against, and especially can't be defended or questioned without being insensitive to the complaints which are supported. It's a

Because they can't be defended against, and especially can't be defended or questioned without being insensitive to the complaints which are supported. It's a share of what Jake is accused of: making it impossible to criticize or question. From a perspective of statistics, these allegations are heresay-- and we've heard them elsewhere. The results in well known cognitive biases where evidence gets double counted when someone elses allegation is simply repeated by someone else.