4 ms·
I honestly still don't understand why MS didn't push their version of 'interface builder' they had with VB6 after they went .net. In my view .net was such a ste
by m_mueller 10y ago
I honestly still don't understand why MS didn't push their version of 'interface builder' they had with VB6 after they went .net. In my view .net was such a step backward - a huge library to load even though the OS comes from the same vendor, way more boilerplate than VB. Why not give VB6 decent networking and database capabilities instead?