3 ms·
Heh. Some empathy would go a long way, bud. When I see people with a "public face" all the time, I can't help but think the same way you you think about those
by bpchaps 10y ago
Heh. Some empathy would go a long way, bud.
When I see people with a "public face" all the time, I can't help but think the same way you you think about those without one. It's scary, it's creepy, it's manipulative, it's far too adaptive, and it's incredibly transparent if you know to look for it.
I have social anxiety that makes having a "public face" impossible to hold for any extended period of time, so I don't even try anymore. I feel happier than ever and have significantly less anxiety without the need to fake it. Though, when I actually need to put on that face (job interview and walking down the street, apparently), it makes me feel dirty to the point of actual physical discomfort under the skin. It's disgusting, but it fucking works, and I refuse to do it unless forced to.
Sorry for the "crazy". A lot of us are just doing the best we can. We'll try to be less terrifying once you actually open up to us.
- sandworm101 10y agoEmpathy requires a public face, the ability to acknowledge and react differently than your base instincts tell you to. Otherwise you only come off as empathetic to people you agree with. Your supporters are enthralled because they see you as an honest mirror, but everyone else thinks you're loony tunes. That ability to keep a public face is perhaps the difference between the universally-loved hollywood celebs, and that polarizing politician.
- bpchaps 10y agoI see little difference between the two. They're just different forms of the same abstraction.