>You suppressed their speech right, no censorship. for there to be censorship, there has to be a censor. that has to be a governing authority with the capabi

>You suppressed their speech right, no censorship. for there to be censorship, there has to be a censor. that has to be a governing authority with the capability to say X is not allowed. Tumblr bloggers have no such authority, and cannot be censors, and therefore cannot censor speech. also conveniently not included in your definitions of censor >a : an official who examines materials (as publications or films) for objectionable matter >b : an official (as in time of war) who reads communications (as letters) and deletes material considered sensitive or harmful >2: one of two magistrates of early Rome acting as census takers, assessors, and inspectors of morals and conduct care to guess what an official is in this context?