3 ms·
noscript author's response: "It's a story of FUD and sensationalism, which got reported in such a careless way that now makes explaining and correcting readers
by jccalhoun 10y ago
noscript author's response:
"It's a story of FUD and sensationalism, which got reported in such a careless way that now makes explaining and correcting readers' perception an uphill battle."
https://hackademix.net/2016/04/08/crossfud-an-analysis-of-inflated-research-and-sloppy-reporting/ https://hackademix.net/2016/04/08/crossfud-an-analysis-of-in...
- RubyPinch 10y ago> Adblock Plus is not less "vulnerable", so to speak, than the other mentioned add-ons, despite what the article states. It's just that those "researchers" were not competent enough to understand how to "exploit" it. This, (plus the fact that ABP was harder to exploit than others via the researchers methods), made me giggle a bit considering the pasts of the two extensions https://google.com/search?q=adblockplus+noscript https://google.com/search?q=adblockplus+noscript