8 ms·
Wow. I always knew hardware manufacturers half-assed their software, but this is kind of a new low. I'm not sure whether to laugh or cry.
by grawlinson 10y ago
Wow. I always knew hardware manufacturers half-assed their software, but this is kind of a new low.
I'm not sure whether to laugh or cry.
- Kubuxu 10y agoWorst part is that they didn't even respond to responsible disclosure. I think someone should write a 'virus' that would remove that vulnerable software from users' computers.
- etatoby 10y agoSomeone should write a virus that replaces the ASUS logo with Goatse, if the damnable thing really is upgradable from within the OS. That should be enough to make them take security seriously (and not really hurt anybody.)
- qb45 10y agoOr with Apple logo, for some extra confusion and hilarity.
- colejohnson66 10y agoSadly, with the current state of the law, you'd be prosecuted for hacking and ASUS goes free. Which is ridiculous.
- qb45 10y agoCould be worse, the title made me imagine UEFI firmware itself making HTTP downloads and reflashing itself ;)
- egeozcan 10y agoI thought that too and then got terrified of the idea that someone trusting an HTTP connection writing (parts of) a damn BIOS. This would be worse than anything. Actually I also don't like BIOS allowing to be flashed from within the OS for convenience. So your computer gets owned and you can't trust your motherboard anymore.
- Kubuxu 10y agoI hate this idea as it usually means that you have to run Windows to upgrade BIOS...
- grawlinson 10y agoYou require Windows regardless. I have an old HP dm1z that's started playing up with a recent Linux release. Solution? New BIOS firmware. Problem? Can only update via Windows binary. I wish I was joking, but quite a few HP laptops can only be updated via Windows binaries...
- qb45 10y agoSolution: buy computers with "generic" motherboards, not OEM boxes. I have had like 5 different motherboards in the last 10 years and all could be updated from a flash drive with the BIOS setup. And yes, this required user action, they didn't just automatically flash random files from pendrives present during POST ;)
- discreditable 10y agoNewer motherboards with ASUS EZ Flash can do that. I don't think it's automatic though.
- jamiesonbecker 10y agoIntel NUC has an option to directly pull down/install BIOS updates built into UEFI as well, and thus probably other newer Intel boards. Convenience and security are often orthogonal.
- technofiend 10y agoYes it does! Although it doesn't seem to work behind a firewall. LOL. In case direct-from-BIOS flash updates aren't silly enough, imagine having to put your server on the naked internet to boot. No thanks. Even TFTP would be better than that.
- ams6110 10y agoThey do that so people with hundreds of servers do not have to spend days in the server room with thumb drives, individually booting servers to flash the BIOS. There is HUGE demand for the ability to do remote BIOS updates over a management network. Now how is the BMC supposed to know whether the network is appropriately secure before accepting those updates?
- icebraining 10y agoYou should never trust the network; firmware updates should have to be cryptographically signed and validated against a pinned certificate to be accepted.
- PeterisP 10y agoThe network shouldn't ever be considered appropriately secure - always treat the network as hostile, and install the updates iff you can be sure that you have received the proper data (with appropriate signatures) over the untrusted network.
- 10y ago
- tehrei 10y agoI am pretty sure that Intel management engine can do that, though obviously it doesn't... Yet
- lmz 10y agoI have a Z77 motherboard that can do that. Not automatically though.
- mkhpalm 10y agoYeah, thats what the title said to me too. Not the case for me since I don't use any of those windows tools from Asus. (run linux instead on all of them)
- yuhong 10y agoThe fun thing is that this is not about the UEFI BIOS binaries itself, which normally must be signed and the signature is checked during UEFI capsule update. The HN title is not exactly correct.