4 ms·
Well no, they do care about the implications. The implication being that by cutting out fraudulent but paying users, they will have fewer paying users. Adverti
by ethanbond 10y ago
Well no, they do care about the implications. The implication being that by cutting out fraudulent but paying users, they will have fewer paying users.
Advertisers and the networks that serve them will never be on the consumer's side. If a consumer wanted to do what an advertiser wanted, the advertiser would be out of work. It's all subversion.
- the_watcher 10y ago> Advertisers and the networks that serve them will never be on the consumer's side. This is a danger, but in an optimal system, one that doesn't come into play. Advertisers pay for eyeballs, eyeballs are there because they haven't been driven away from the product by ads that ruin the experience.