4 ms·
No. You're basically saying that there's no evidence that it's a coordinated campaign (really, the fact that it was talked about on Twitter isn't evidence of a
by powera 10y ago
No.
You're basically saying that there's no evidence that it's a coordinated campaign (really, the fact that it was talked about on Twitter isn't evidence of anything at all), and that lack of evidence is why it has to be a coordinated campaign. Which is a logical fallacy at best.
EDIT: that wasn't quite what I meant. There's some evidence that somebody is coordinating it. There's no evidence that it's a hostile government. The evidence suggests that the coordinator is somebody who feels that they were sexually harassed.
- brador 10y agoNo. I said there are hints of evidence of a coordinated campaign. Which there are. This could be from the number of people involved, or a guiding hand. I placed no stake in the ground on either possibility. Your personal attack at calling it a logical fallacy is noted.
- powera 10y ago"Your personal attack at calling it a logical fallacy is noted." - no, it's not a personal attack, I'm saying the argument is incorrect.
- brador 10y agoThe argument you read incorrectly and misinterpreted.
- powera 10y agoYou might not have been arguing that it was related to the government, but the two posts you were replying to sure did, so I assumed you were as well, apparently incorrectly. If there's anything else I've misinterpreted, you're going to have to spell it out.