5 ms·
> Bash is the only shell scripting language permitted for executables. Why? That seems completely arbitrary. I already lost interest in following this in the
by hobarrera 10y ago
> Bash is the only shell scripting language permitted for executables.
Why? That seems completely arbitrary.
I already lost interest in following this in the first line.
> Executables should have no extension (strongly preferred) or a .sh extension. Libraries must have a .sh extension and should not be executable.
So, not only are they bash-only, but you add an extension that makes one assume the contrary. UGH!
- ams6110 10y agoThe answer to your question is obvious if you've ever worked in a large development organization.
- hobarrera 10y agoYou could have bothered sharing it, if it's so obvious.
- havetocharge 10y agoYou have much to learn. You should be reading more of this stuff, not less.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]