2 ms·
I've never understood this argument. To me, it seems obvious that 10X programmers exist. How much faster would John Carmack produce a new graphics engine than
by charlieflowers 10y ago
I've never understood this argument. To me, it seems obvious that 10X programmers exist.
How much faster would John Carmack produce a new graphics engine than a recent bootcamp grad? How much better would Carmack's be?
I know I've gone to unfair extremes with the question, but it still illustrates the point. Really excellent developers are waaay more productive. The upside is huge. All the time saved avoiding blind alleys based on experience, all the cases where experienced intuition identifies the cause of a bug that would have taken much longer, etc.
- ljw1001 10y agothe popular claim is 10X better than average. Not 10X better then suck. And definitely not 10X better than a total newbie at the one thing you've worked on your entire career.
- mpbm 10y agoAlso, it's not actually "10x". That's just easier to write than "an order of magnitude", which is a subjective thing in productivity. The idea is vaguer than the "10x" abbreviation implies.