3 ms·
Less compassionate to those undeserving of it, sure. Isn't that a good thing? I'm not a fan of UBI but this aspect might turn out to be really beneficial in rev
by brbsix 10y ago
Less compassionate to those undeserving of it, sure. Isn't that a good thing? I'm not a fan of UBI but this aspect might turn out to be really beneficial in reversing the perverse incentives and dysgenic effects of current social benefits programs.
- toomuchtodo 10y ago> Less compassionate to those undeserving of it, sure. Isn't that a good thing? Only if we want to continue to have addicts and the mentally ill homeless, abused, and taken advantage of.
- prawn 10y agoWho's undeserving though? Someone lazy, sure. But someone impaired through birth defect or accident or mental illness? How do you determine whether someone is lazy but claiming anxiety/depression, or actually suffering?