3 ms·
> 9/9 could have gotten wet. This is very unlikely in negative temperatures in the -30-20 range. > It's not clear at all that this group's 1959 best practices
by forgotpwtomain 10y ago
> 9/9 could have gotten wet.
This is very unlikely in negative temperatures in the -30-20 range.
> It's not clear at all that this group's 1959 best practices (even given their considerable experience) was on par with what we would do now.
Even supposing the unlikely event that 9/9 did get hypothermia before other symptoms, you are still saying that they all became simultaneously delirious to the point that not even one of them was found dead in a position that indicated some kind of normal reaction one would expect from an experienced person (I'm not saying a life-saving reaction - we know no one survived, but anything remotely bordering on rational)..
- natch 10y agoYou seem to forget that warm skin can melt snow, and that sweat can dampen and even soak clothes. There are plenty of ways to get wet. The operational range of temperatures includes temperatures as high as 98.6F or more when humans are in the picture. Sweat and snow melt at far below 98.6F. "Simultaneously" is your own bizarre projection, not something I said or would say.