3 ms·
> The problem is you're extremely likely to get either a reality B CEO, or an asshole with reality B revenue. You do propose HP as a case study, but why is it
by ksaun 10y ago
> The problem is you're extremely likely to get either a reality B CEO, or an asshole with reality B revenue.
You do propose HP as a case study, but why is it "extremely likely" to lead to that negative outcome?
Also, isn't it possible for a "nice guy" CEO to also bring in high revenue?
I don't think "nice" necessarily equates with "ineffective" in a CEO (for some definitions of "nice").
- beagle3 10y agoBecause, to quote Sturgeon, "90% of everything is crud", and that includes CEO candidates.
- TheOtherHobbes 10y agoReality C is far more common - CEO is an asshole and clueless about running a profitable business. Because they're too busy and distracted by self-important posturing and/or outright fraud to make good decisions. Competent assholes are far less common than incompetent assholes. There's a bizarre myth that being an asshole somehow correlates with business competence. But that doesn't take any account of the large number of asshole CEOs who are crash-and-burn fuck ups.