3 ms·
Whew, I wouldn't want to be THAT kid growing up. The one for whom all the trees in the world were killed. You seem to elevate human life above all else. Religi
by Luc 17y ago
Whew, I wouldn't want to be THAT kid growing up. The one for whom all the trees in the world were killed.
You seem to elevate human life above all else. Religious reasons? Consciousness being inherently superior? I'd be interested to know the premises that leads to your conclusion.
- mapleoin 17y agoKilling 150.000 to save a human life doesn't sound like any religion I ever heard of. Religions are more concerned with saving souls and no amount of trees cut has ever saved a soul.
- Luc 17y agoI was referring to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inviolability http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inviolability , but I'm sure there's a rich vein of religious thought that considers 1 human life more worthy of saving than any amount of non-human life.
- swombat 17y agoThe reasoning is relatively simple, and my conclusions and actions are not all that different from those of people who do respect and take care of the environment. I believe very strongly that we humans will not be happy, nor even, probably, able to live, on a world without the eco-system we have around us. We need to preserve it, for our survival, our esthetic enjoyment, etc. However, what I believe equally strongly is that all of this comes down, ultimately, to us, and our subjective experience of the world. There is no intrinsic value to anything outside of the human mind. Man is the measure of all things. As such, any action to preserve the environment must do so while preserving, above all else, human life, freedom, the pursuit of happiness, and other core human values. I fear that ecologism will grow into a movement that declares nature worth more than other core human values, including human life and freedom. I fear that ecologists will become oppressors, turning society against itself in a bid to "save the world", and thus entirely missing the point of saving the world (which is, to allow us humans to continue enjoying the world). Is that clearer?
- Luc 17y agoI don't find myself agreeing with your views (we could argue, but what's the point), but that's a pretty good explanation, thank you.