Is this article somehow getting past the duplicates filter? I'm sure I've seen it here before, and Google turned up http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1164968

Is this article somehow getting past the duplicates filter? I'm sure I've seen it here before, and Google turned up http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1164968 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1164968 and http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1130197 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1130197 (not sure if either of these were actually the version I read).