6 ms·
This is great. Reminds me of the recent article in nature questioning whether or not scientists need a PhD: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7285/full
by alexbiz 17y ago
This is great. Reminds me of the recent article in nature questioning whether or not scientists need a PhD:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7285/full/464007a.html http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7285/full/464007a...
- zitterbewegung 17y agoI really don't think scientists need a PhD but it probably helps a great deal when doing independent research
- rick_2047 17y agoSeconded, you need a PhD to get funding. Actually the chief purpose of PhD(or any other type of degree) now (in my views, anyway) is just to put you on the map. So you can prove to people that you can do what you already did. Gone are the days when people actually did a PhD or degree courses to learn something new. Most of the times, specially in undergraduate studies, people could as well study on there own and just pay the fees to enjoy the university culture.
- tibbon 17y agoI'd like to see someone become a CSO at a funded and successful biotech without a PhD.