Wasn't that the very basis of the Aaron Schwartz case? That, by violating the terms of use of the MIT site, he was violating the CFAA thus charged with multiple

Wasn't that the very basis of the Aaron Schwartz case? That, by violating the terms of use of the MIT site, he was violating the CFAA thus charged with multiple felonies? The linked case dealt with employees but I don't see why there should be a distinction. I would consider the general public to have even greater protections.