> So it's a little early to call it "next generation." Please don't ignore words other people write, or at least reread before hitting post. I did say possibly

> So it's a little early to call it "next generation." Please don't ignore words other people write, or at least reread before hitting post. I did say possibly. > I don't see why it's "impressive that it works at all." I thought it was implicit from my explanation that the "works at all" includes the fact that the data sizes are reasonable already. If we had the same result, but the intermediary data was 18 gigabytes, then there would be nothing impressive about it. As it is, we're a lot below that, before further compression, so it is. Remember: Prototype, Proof of Concept. You're looking at the first step, not the last step. You're looking at a motor carriage, not a Tesla.