> "Why did X have an omelette for lunch" is not going to have a Wikipedia article, let alone people talking about it over half a century later. You are being c

> "Why did X have an omelette for lunch" is not going to have a Wikipedia article, let alone people talking about it over half a century later. You are being circular in your reasoning. The OP is saying that for an event that is not so odd or eventful, it receives a disproportionate amount of attention including its own Wikipedia article. He goes on to explain why it's not odd or eventful. You're saying, "Of course it's odd and eventful! It has its own Wikipedia article."