11 ms·
Dropbox Smeared in Week of Megabreaches
- jpmattia 10y agoBuried lede imo: TeamViewer having similar issues. Lots of folks claiming it's breached, TV denying it. A lot of potential mischief there, if breached. https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/4m7ay6/teamviewer_has_been_hacked_they_are_denying/ https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/4m7ay6/teamview...
- jasonellis 10y agoI have found no indication that my TeamViewer computers were hacked, but after reading this for a few days I finally disabled TV on them last night and I'm looking for other solutions. After using TeamViewer for over 5 years, I started getting a handful of invites on the service from random names about a month ago (I had never gotten a single invite prior). That alone signaled to me that something may be amiss. I'm afraid that where there is smoke, there's fire.
- JorgeGT 10y agoHave you considered NoMachine NX? I found it to be more or less comparable in terms of performance and settled on it because I wasn't very keen of the centralized TV model.
- NTripleOne 10y agoYeah, those invites have been going out for a while now, I've been receiving them for the past 2~3 months. I set up a fresh windows 7 VM with the intention of seeing what would come of the requests - but none of them ever came online after accepting.
- JamesSwift 10y agoWow, thanks for this. I couldn't find anything in that thread so I'll ask here in case anyone knows: is TeamViewer safe if it's NAT'ed with no open ports, or is there an opportunity when it phones home to compromise the machine?
- cmdrfred 10y agoFrom what I read someone might of hijacked teamviewers DNS records and pointed them at a server they control. People reported logins during the outage and even though they have TFA enabled. I've never heard of using teamviewer solely on the local network, but even so with an attack like that they can probably just push an infected update and own you that way.
- fencepost 10y agoYesterday's discussion of a possible TeamViewer hack: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11826431 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11826431
- JamesBaxter 10y agoTroy Hunt wrote an interesting post on how he verfies breaches recently[0] The amount of fact checking tech "journalists" do means wrong information can really spiral out of control. I wonder if Dropbox can sue? [0]https://www.troyhunt.com/heres-how-i-verify-data-breaches/ https://www.troyhunt.com/heres-how-i-verify-data-breaches/
- ghrifter 10y ago> tech "journalists" ah the old cut and paste from one site's article, rearrange some words, grind it through a thesarus-izer, then repost.
- draw_down 10y agoVery irresponsible behavior.
- xufi 10y agoAgreed, This happened to them before I believe. Besides Dropbox, I heard other companies like Linkedin recently were hacked and thousands of users passwords were leaked. I guess its safe to say in this day and age you can never be sure sometimes
- maxerickson 10y agoLifelock should just be regulated out of existence. If a company can add $100 of value per year by pretending to monitor credit reports, the credit bureaus can be instructed that whatever Lifelock is doing is table stakes for a company that is selling evaluations of creditworthiness.
- ccvannorman 10y agoLifelock was just doing their job (they thought). Also they offer insurance of up to $1M for damages as a result of ID theft. As far as ID theft continues to be pervasive we need companies like LL.
- dnm 10y agoWhat does that $1M actually cover though? “But if someone takes out a mortgage in your name and now you owe the bank $100k or more – nobody covers that, and that’s what they need to cover.” http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/03/are-credit-monitoring-services-worth-it/ http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/03/are-credit-monitoring-ser...
- ccvannorman 10y agoUsually the banks take responsibility for that as it's their duty to do due diligence (say that six times fast!). I've had my credit card # stolen plenty of times and never been liable. LifeLock's insurance covers court/lawyer fees/damages, IIRC.
- billmalarky 10y agoI'm starting to think Lifelock would be a better product for consumers if they completely avoided the protection side of the business and just beefed up the insurance side of the business.
- maxerickson 10y agoSo why not require the credit bureaus to spend $1 million when they fail to do what they say they do! It's called identity theft, but that's just a successful marketing campaign by the lazy banks and credit bureaus. It's fraud, and they (try to) push the consequences off on a party that is not really able to prevent it from happening. We should just tell them they aren't allowed to do that. Then we don't need Lifelock anymore.
- bogomipz 10y ago"CSID, an identity monitoring firm that is in the midst of being acquired by credit bureau giant Experian." Experian a few months ago had a breach whereby millions of T mobile customers who had no idea that Experian was storing their data, had all of their sensitive data stolen. Experian's "solution" to the problem was to offer those who had their data stolen 2 years of free credit monitoring. Think about that for a moment - "we allowed your sensitive data that you didn't approve of us storing to be compromised and so we will now offer you a 2 year service after which you will be charged." That is so completely outrageous, people should be out with pitchforks and torches but you can't fight this stuff, these agencies are far too powerful. Just to further underscore how outrageous Experian and the other two agencies are - Experian notified people who had their data compromised using snail mail! What kind of decision is that for a time-sensitive situation?! Lastly the letter they sent to customers and I read my friend who was a victims letter, said that the data that was compromised was data they were storing on T Mobile's behalf, as if they were in no way culpable. So I guess I this is their strategy going forward is to acquire a half-baked and suspect security firm that will damage innocent companies reputations the same way they themselves have damaged innocent people's credit and identities. I would urge people to call the three big credit agencies - Trans Union, Experian and Equifax and request that your credit be "locked." This means that nobody can look at your credit profile, except for people you currently have a line of credit with. You will be issued a pin and if and when you need to apply for credit you can then unlock your credit profile and re0lock it afterward. You need to re-up on this every two years which is insane as having your credit profile locked should be the default and should be in perpetuity, but you do what you can.
- toomuchtodo 10y ago> I would urge people to call the three big credit agencies - Trans Union, Experian and Equifax and request that your credit be "locked." This means that nobody can look at your credit profile, except for people you currently have a line of credit with. You will be issued a pin and if and when you need to apply for credit you can then unlock your credit profile and re0lock it afterward. You need to re-up on this every two years which is insane as having your credit profile locked should be the default and should be in perpetuity, but you do what you can. Keep in mind you will be charged for this. https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0497-credit-freeze-faqs https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0497-credit-freeze-faq... > You'll need to supply your name, address, date of birth, Social Security number and other personal information. Fees vary based on where you live, but commonly range from $5 to $10.
- jbandela1 10y agoI wonder if this file with the tumblr passwords was placed in an unprotected shared dropbox folder. Thus, although the actual passwords were from tumblr, the passwords were downloaded by "worm" via a dropbox "breach".
- rcarmo 10y agoStrangely enough, my Dropbox client just asked me for a password for the first time in... ages. Says it's version 5.3.19.
- syphilis2 10y agoOne of my free credit monitoring services, which I received as compensation from a previous data leak, alerted me last week that a few email accounts of mine wound up in a dropbox. A few things I noticed: The alert only says that the "Potential Site" of where the email was compromised is listed as www.dropbox.com . The option for changing a password in online mail clients is lost in the menu clutter. In Gmail the process is to click Menu Bubble > My Account > Signing in to Gmail > Password. The issue I had is that at the 1st menu level there are options for Google+ Profile, Settings, Privacy, and My Account which all seem like valid places for the Change Password option to live. Each submenu is similarly cluttered, though when I found the correct path it made sense in retrospect. I can't imagine Grandma changing her Gmail password this way. Maybe Google could replace the "Dvorak Keyboard" menu (Select Input Tool > English Dvorak) with an Update Password button. Is there a simpler process I'm not aware of?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- powera 10y agoSo many people will believe anything a "hacker" says as long as it's bad for them. In general, these 100 million password dumps are almost always complete garbage, but everyone along the way says "better to be safe than sorry" and ignores all the warning signs (in this case, that the file obviously wasn't Dropbox credentials).
- BrainInAJar 10y agoAnd they want in to your kernel...