3 ms·
Here's a rational approach that may be appreciated here :) Make a concious decision to try and settle down with one of the first 6 girls you date. Here's the r
by cliveholloway 17y ago
Here's a rational approach that may be appreciated here :)
Make a concious decision to try and settle down with one of the first 6 girls you date. Here's the rules:
1) don't settle for the first one you date.
2) the next one you date that is better than the first one you dated is the one you settle for.
Why? Do the math. Let's label them 123456.
If you date 1 first, you have 1 in 5 chance of ending up with any of the others (1 in 30 for each)
If you date 2 first, you end up with 1 (1 in 6)
If you date 3 first, you can end up with 1 or 2 (1 in 12 each)
If you date 4 first, you can end up with 1, 2 or 3 (1 in 18 each)
If you date 5 first, you end up with 1, 2, 3 or 4 (1 in 24 each)
If you date 6 first, you end up with 1,2 .. 5 (1 in 30 each).
Add that up, and the odds of you settling for each woman are:
1 - 38.1%,
2 - 24.7%,
3 - 16.4%,
4 - 10.1%,
5 - 6.7%,
6 - 3.3%
So, 79.2% of the time you "settle" for someone above average. And, for the other 20.8%? You can always split up before it's too late :)
- fizx 17y agoYou should look at http://www.parabola.unsw.edu.au/vol45_no2/node2.html http://www.parabola.unsw.edu.au/vol45_no2/node2.html which derives that the best strategy is to use the first 1/e of your potential dating life to set a baseline, and then choose the best partner that exceeds it.
- BearOfNH 17y agoand then choose the best partner that exceeds it Meaning, choose the next candidate who is better than the previous ones.
- huherto 17y agoVery interesting. The example for a young man that wants to get married between 20-39 is to date until 27 and then marry the best partner that exceeds it. In the case of a woman is different. Assuming her prime is between 20-33; her strategy should be to date until 24 and then marry the best man that exceeds it. right? edit: grammar