3 ms·
Neither are that hard to explain plausibly, and the wikipedia page does so. Brain damage could come from concussive forces applied from the blasts of the (specu
by zdkl 10y ago
Neither are that hard to explain plausibly, and the wikipedia page does so. Brain damage could come from concussive forces applied from the blasts of the (speculated) explosive ordnance tests, this would in turn explain the absence of external soft tissue trauma?
The tongue part, as is the case for a lot of missing limb story, sounds like some critter found a soft, yummy looking part of the corpse and made away with it.
The bigger mystery IMO, is the absence of reported blast marks or damage to the terrain one would expect from testing explosives.
- stared 10y ago> The bigger mystery IMO, is the absence of reported blast marks or damage to the terrain one would expect from testing explosives. Mid air?
- vocatus_gate 10y agoMany HE munitions are airburst, because they cause greater damage from aerial deployment than they do close to the ground. For example nuclear weapons are detonated 1-2 miles above the ground. Considering that fact it doesn't rule out a conventional military munition.
- Smushman 10y agoIt was some time before they were found, and the snow might have hindered identification of that.