4 ms·
They could have stuck with the .mp4 extension, but they were attempting to reduce the potential for confusion. It's a file extension, once we embrace the fact t
by vizeroth 10y ago
They could have stuck with the .mp4 extension, but they were attempting to reduce the potential for confusion. It's a file extension, once we embrace the fact that it is just a hint (and can be a lie), it doesn't really matter so much.
The MPEG-4 format was based on the QuickTime format, so it shouldn't be any surprise that Apple prefers to go with an MPEG-4 format even when an acceptable alternative is available. The reality is that Apple doesn't support very many alternatives to MPEG-4 formats, and they probably wouldn't support MP3 if it weren't for the fact that they wouldn't have been able to take a significant position in the market for digital media players without MP3 playback. The same will probably never be the case for Ogg or FLAC.
- tacos 10y agoI'm aware of at least two (actual) MPEG-4 lossless formats (MPEG-4 ALS and MPEG-4 SLS). ALAC is just a random format worse than the existing one at the time, stuffed in a .m4a container. (Apparently .caf as well.)
- vizeroth 10y agoMPEG-4 ALS and SLS were standardized after ALAC was released in OS X/QuickTime/iTunes, but yes, those are two more possibilities when you have an .mp4 or .m4a file, and the pile of other extensions they can use.