3 ms·
Snapchat has undoubtedly grown; it's really impressive. But much of Twitter's content you can consume without being logged-in. Is that accounted for at all?
by niftich 10y ago
Snapchat has undoubtedly grown; it's really impressive. But much of Twitter's content you can consume without being logged-in. Is that accounted for at all?
- teej 10y agoTwitter reports Monthly Active Users as 310M [1] which, as far as I can tell[2], represents just logged-in users. I presume that Bloomberg would use the standard-ish term of "active users" to mean the same thing. Twitter also reports it has 1B monthly uniques "to sites with embedded Tweets"[1]. [1] - https://about.twitter.com/company https://about.twitter.com/company [2] - http://www.statista.com/statistics/282087/number-of-monthly-active-twitter-users/ http://www.statista.com/statistics/282087/number-of-monthly-...
- pavedwalden 10y agoHmm. That's an interesting thought about how to skew 'engagement' stats. Maybe that's why I can't view Pinterest pages without that irritating "you must log in" sheet scrolling over the content.
- xeromal 10y agoYou can actually delete that and keep scrolling