2 ms·
Well, as it's not an economic argument, I'd agree. However, his political argument in that essay should not be given special credence because he was one of his
by Semiapies 17y ago
Well, as it's not an economic argument, I'd agree.
However, his political argument in that essay should not be given special credence because he was one of history's greatest physicists.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- Semiapies 17y agoMaybe you mean axioms. I don't see why you're defending an essay pimping socialism after the results of socialism over the course of the 20th century. Einstein had the excuse of much of what happened in the Soviet Union being effectively covered up; in the wake of our knowledge of what happened there, during the Cultural Revolution, etc., it's just not excusable in 2010. It's like linking to Ludwig von Mises rambling about FTL travel.
- freebsd_dude 17y agohuh? They are called the "Fundamental Theorems of Welfare Economics" - look it up in any graduate econ text. Stop ranting.
- Semiapies 17y agoYou'll know when I rant. :)