2 ms·
I was 19 when I first read Rand. I'm 29 now, and I still love her philosophy and her novels. I'm willing to be that you haven't read her very closely. At any r
by maxharris 17y ago
I was 19 when I first read Rand. I'm 29 now, and I still love her philosophy and her novels. I'm willing to be that you haven't read her very closely.
At any rate, your quote is a mere ad-hominem attack, and I don't think that anyone here will mistake it for an actual argument.
- camccann 17y agoNo, an ad-hominem would imply an attack on the character or worth of Rand personally. gnosis's comment was merely a bald assertion about the novel, though indeed not an argument as such. Of course, your Rand quote was also pretty much just a bald assertion without any supporting argument, so I guess it works out.
- maxharris 17y agoHis comment is an ad-hominem attack on Objectivists (e.g., people like me.)