you could argue that, most evolution conclusions are based on visible outcomes and the assumption it has utility, rather than actually proving it has more utili

you could argue that, most evolution conclusions are based on visible outcomes and the assumption it has utility, rather than actually proving it has more utility over a failed line of evolution that researchers will never see I would like to point out that many mammals have more genetic safe guards than humans do against cancer cells, so my conclusion is that humans have a flaw