2 ms·
I got it down to 0.51-something by simply switching keys iff the measure increased. Ironic, since I was exhibiting no "free will" by following that rule :)
by colanderman 10y ago
I got it down to 0.51-something by simply switching keys iff the measure increased. Ironic, since I was exhibiting no "free will" by following that rule :)
- SilasX 10y agoI did that too and it worked for a short while, but then started increasing without bound. I wish it would list the record as you go.
- colanderman 10y ago1.0 is a fixpoint of that strategy! Since increasing values cause you to switch keys, and continually switching keys is perfectly predictable.