3 ms·
I tried zpaq four years ago and it looked very well built, but exceptionally slow (as in, 5-10 times slower than bup at the time). Have things changed?
by beagle3 10y ago
I tried zpaq four years ago and it looked very well built, but exceptionally slow (as in, 5-10 times slower than bup at the time). Have things changed?
- ComodoHacker 10y agoI didn't compare with bup and can't say how much has it improved in four years. But yes, subjectively it's slow, mostly because of compression I guess. Not "exceptionally" slow though. With default settings it's a good tradeoff IMO.