I wasn't really pushing a point. I was trying to add some perspective on the issue. But if I were to push one, I'd say that the question of whether or not our e

I wasn't really pushing a point. I was trying to add some perspective on the issue. But if I were to push one, I'd say that the question of whether or not our experience is "real" should really be considered a pseudo-problem, because it's a question that can't be really answered. I don't see an issue with believing things that might be considered incorrect in the future, but I do see an issue with asking the wrong questions over and over again. I see no particular reason why someone ought to be responsible for the patterns of experience. Thinking it so is the crucial mistake here.