4 ms·
The media sees Silicon Valley as a competitor. A natural enemy. The Valley after all deals with distribution of information on a massive scale. Traditionally t
by internaut 10y ago
The media sees Silicon Valley as a competitor. A natural enemy.
The Valley after all deals with distribution of information on a massive scale. Traditionally this was a position held by either the Government or the Media. The state is still in the game for the usual reason of having access to unparalleled force on demand. The media on the other side has been much diminished by the Net, which is not what you'd expect if you thought they were information gathering and disseminating organizations. They deplore it!
In fact their power stems from the ability to form opinion and synchronize the mood of mass numbers of people. If the world is the Middle Ages then the Media is the Witchfinder General. If the Witch is a person, the tabloids typically deal with it. If the Witch is an idea, the broadsheets do it while congratulating themselves on their distinction to the tabloids.
This is all natural behavior of people, but it becomes focused like a laser on the whims of the opinion making classes. Sometimes journalists, typically of the Harvard School, sometimes those paying them to direct the faucet like advertisers or 'secret source' officials. The media has a similar role to the owner of a military garrison at a strategic river bend. The river and its traffic are wholly natural but the garrison is used to regulate it.
Suppose that the media were not the opinion forming organs of the people. What then? Chaos? Anarchy? Dogs and cats living together? No.
In fact people would naturally talk to each other on the new medium of information. We'd continue to develop tumblrs and 4chans. Thousands of small communities gossiping away about whatever they believe concerns them. Sometimes they would go overboard, but groups have an instinct for self preservation and mostly self regulate.
What would be diminished is the synchronization of opinion. Themes would still exist, perhaps more strongly than before, still a left and a right. Notice how the social justice advocates and NRX formed themselves organically. Neither of these groups can be integrated into the mainstream politics today. It's not that they are too extreme, it is that they evolve too quickly to be controlled at the same rate as before (it's like biology, smaller entities evolve faster). The connection between low church and high church is severed.
Gamergate is some evidence for my hypothesis, just in microcosm. We see a smaller community with one narrative crushed by the larger one with a different narrative. The Media does not like competition.
- hellbanner 10y agoHi, have you read http://degree180.com/8686-2/ http://degree180.com/8686-2/ ? Founder of a business for identifying cyber-bullies threatened by one "Zoe Quinn" that continuation of their campaign would result in harassment.. According to the author, no complaints were received prior to this threat. After this threat, user complaints resulted in killing their kickstarter.
- SilasX 10y agoYuck. Got a tl;dr? I'm tired of every other paragraph being a diversion into discussion of what she was wearing or other irrelevancy.
- hellbanner 10y agoSee my above comment. Gamergate "victims" actually are responsible for cyber-bullying, not the other way around. Author thinks there's big $ in anonymous bullying.
- internaut 10y agoAll is fair in love and war! It is certainly true that the anti-gamergate people needed no help from the formal media to go on raids. What appalls me is that I don't think most of them know they're raiding. Still the formal media did recognize them as a natural ally and appeared to universally pan the gamergate community so far as I could see. That is the focus on my attention, because I wonder most about why that would be so.