Computing technology is developing rapidly, which he cites as the reason it is likely we are simulated. However, if we are in a simulation, the laws of physics

Computing technology is developing rapidly, which he cites as the reason it is likely we are simulated. However, if we are in a simulation, the laws of physics are likely different from those in "base reality." Moore's law in the sim would have no basis in underlying reality. The sim creator may have tuned the laws of physics to make it easy to develop microprocessors, when in base reality it is difficult. So I don't think his argument is valid at all.