why? The result is the same. He probably could have used an "independent" organization but why bother? Organizations are only as independent as their control of

why? The result is the same. He probably could have used an "independent" organization but why bother? Organizations are only as independent as their control of their own funding. He could have just said to some organization "Here is the money. You will spend it suing gawker after taking your overhead." Personally I don't think this is a large issue. Neither SV nor in constitution is at stake here. If he was suing The National Enquirer for publishing a sex tape and not gawker would we really still be discussing this?