Another Gawker victim issues a Good vs Evil argument to justify disproportional attack on unwanted (by the victims) speech. Not surprising. To me, part of the

Another Gawker victim issues a Good vs Evil argument to justify disproportional attack on unwanted (by the victims) speech. Not surprising. To me, part of the problem with some of these new Gilded billionaires is this (apparent) principle of the "Good vs Evil" argument. Google used it as company mission. It sounds... immature. It sounds irrational. It sounds like something out of comic books. Maybe Thiel thinks he's bruce wayne who needs to act in the shadows to "do good".