5 ms·
What I don't get is if Peter truly feels he was doing a public good by shutting down Gawker, why must he do so in secret? Would the mission be impaired if the
by jgalt212 10y ago
What I don't get is if Peter truly feels he was doing a public good by shutting down Gawker, why must he do so in secret?
Would the mission be impaired if the sponsor were revealed
or
is Peter an underhanded snake?
- Kristine1975 10y agoMaybe he doesn't want to be in the spotlight. "Do good without bragging about it."
- 4bpp 10y agoI doubt the decision in the Gawker case was made in complete isolation from the public opinion, and public favour these days is significantly based upon who can depict themselves as the underdog/victim and therefore claim the moral high ground. Presumably, being financially supported by Thiel would not exactly have earned Hogan underdog points.