5 ms·
Google Reader: Play
- solutionyogi 17y agoWhy did I click on this? There are enough outlets on the web for me to waste my time!
- Groxx 17y agoWe know you wants it. It calls to us. We needs it. Must. Have. The precious!
- tkiley 17y agoIf this catches on, I could see a lot of site owners crying foul over the fact that google is scraping the choicest bits of content w/o providing any page views or ad revenue.
- mquander 17y ago"This" being RSS readers, I presume.
- tkiley 17y agoI don't think this is just another RSS reader. Here's why: In a typical RSS reader, the relationship between the user and the content producer is more pronounced; the user proactively selects content sources and knows where each piece of content comes from; as a result, there is still a significant element of brand reinforcement. The internet has discussed the economic implications of RSS readers ad nauseam so I wont go there. However, this isn't just an RSS reader; this site allows me (as a reader) to consume an amazing amount of content with pretty much no idea where it came from and very little inducement for follow-up interaction with the content creator. In other words: Google Play is basically stumbleupon, except in Google's version, the "toolbar" takes up the entire screen. Google is redefining the transaction in a way that minimizes value for the content creators and maximizes value for Google.
- netcan 17y agoI wouldn't use such damning words, but basically I agree. The thing is, RSS hasn't caught on with users/readers after all this time. I think we can safely say most people won't ever use an RSS reader in the way that was expected, a pull email system. It has however, caught on with publishers. That makes it into a behind the scenes technology that users don't really need to know about, which I think means the disconnect is to be expected. I don't think there is a clear line between the implications previously discussed (ad nauseam) and this, if a user doesn't know what an rss feed is.
- mquander 17y agoWell put. I agree that in practice, these sort of smart sites have much different implications than RSS readers. But as we all know, if you put it out there, people can do as they will with it. If content producers don't like this, their only good recourse is to drop their RSS feeds (or embed ads in their content, which is still vulnerable to the RSS equivalent of an ad-blocker.)
- geuis 17y agoI don't understand, how do I look at my own Google Reader feeds? This just looks like a bunch of random crap I'm not interested in.
- brown9-2 17y agoThat is exactly the point: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/finding-awesome-stuff-online-with.html http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/finding-awesome-stuff...
- rpdillon 17y agoYeah, and from the article you just linked to: "Just click the feed settings menu on any feed in Reader and select “View in Reader Play.”"
- SandB0x 17y agoUh, what? One totally random article, then the second item: http://icanread.tumblr.com/post/432293483 http://icanread.tumblr.com/post/432293483 Lovely. I don't have anything remotely like this in my subscriptions.
- mds 17y agoThat was the second or third item I got too.
- ebun 17y agoPretty interesting. It's the FastFlip of Google Reader. With FastFlip, you don't have as much choice as to the news they show so I guess they're going the same direction here with Reader Play
- jenningsjason 17y agofeels like a faster, less relevant version of StumbleUpon
- pclark 17y agois that useful?
- zavulon 17y agoHow are the privacy settings?
- KirinDave 17y agoIt's a stream of unfunny content. Thanks, google!
- yanw 17y agoI like that it incorporates the keyboard shortcuts.
- padmanabhan01 17y agoThis could have been designed a whole lot better..
- jsz0 17y agoI can see potential in this for living room browsing on a TV. It's more of a passive approach to content. You don't have to seek anything out -- it's just there and you can click Next if you don't like it for something else. Everything seems to be formatted well for a TV sized/resolution display. If this was built into my TV or other set tops I'd probably use it.
- eplanit 17y agoI stopped at "We'll keep track..." Yes, I know that they do and that they will. Enough!
- delackner 17y agoI tapped the right arrow for about 10 minutes and still never saw a single thing that felt like real content. I would think it would get the hint that I didn't LIKE any of it.
- orionlogic 17y agoa fear trembling on me pushing a new button from Google, after the Buzz's privacy fiasco .
- Groxx 17y agoMine has actually been extremely relevant to my feeds. Might be because I've been religiously starring favored articles for over a year (a few hundred, easily). Reader is the best and worst thing that's happened to my time for a long time.
- cake 17y agoAnnnd another useless feature of Google Reader. I can't understand the way they decide how Google Reader evolves, I mean they just have to pick up one of the many feature requests : http://productideas.appspot.com/#16/e=22493 http://productideas.appspot.com/#16/e=22493 GR lacks many basic features (read an item later, filters, views per feeds...)