4 ms·
The Internet Archive (helped by EFF) got one disclosed in 2008: https://www.eff.org/cases/archive-v-mukasey https://www.eff.org/cases/archive-v-mukasey https:
by greglindahl 10y ago
The Internet Archive (helped by EFF) got one disclosed in 2008:
https://www.eff.org/cases/archive-v-mukasey https://www.eff.org/cases/archive-v-mukasey
https://www.eff.org/document/national-security-letter-internet-archive https://www.eff.org/document/national-security-letter-intern...
Yahoo's claiming "This marks the first time any company has been able to publicly acknowledge receiving an NSL as a result of the reforms of the USA Freedom Act." -- which is kind of true, in that IA got one released before the reforms!
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- morgante 10y agoFor an even more technical truth, IA is not a company.
- cjak 10y agoTechnically correct, the best type of correct.
- woodman 10y agoTechnically it is, colloquially it isn't.
- dragonwriter 10y agoActually, IA is both a company and a corporation. Its legally a charitable non-profit corporation, but that's a specific kinds of company, not a not-a-company. So, your "technical truth" isn't.
- morgante 10y agoWell, I agree that IA is a corporation as that is a legal structure. Technically a "company" has to be commercial in nature, at least if you go by the dictionary definition. This is entirely too pedantic though, and it rather upsets me that people feel the need to down vote this.
- dragonwriter 10y agoActually, IA is both a company and a corporation. Its legally a charitable non-profit corporation, but that's a specific kinds of company, not a not-a-company. So, your"technical truth" isn't.