4 ms·
Yes, that is what my point was. And yes, your most recent response clarifies your counterargument. I assume you meant to say "Since 2007, AMD has continually i
by projectramo 10y ago
Yes, that is what my point was.
And yes, your most recent response clarifies your counterargument.
I assume you meant to say "Since 2007, AMD has continually improved..."
So I stand corrected in that I didn't realize AMD had closed the gap.
However, my point was about the relative manufacturing ability of Intel and its competitors. Am I to understand your claim that AMD's manufacturing is (approximately) as good as Intel's at the moment?
I don't have any new information, but its a very, very hard problem. And a brief google search seems to indicate that AMD has faced more recent challenges:
http://www.wired.com/2012/03/amd-global-foundries/ http://www.wired.com/2012/03/amd-global-foundries/
- nl 10y agoI assume you meant to say "Since 2007, AMD has continually improved..." No, Intel is the one with the reliable continual improvement process. That is their advantage, not ability to manufacture large volumes.