4 ms·
Isn't "text understanding engine" a poor description of what is basically a classifier? I'd expect a text understanding engine to do more than classify, I'd ex
by cromwellian 10y ago
Isn't "text understanding engine" a poor description of what is basically a classifier?
I'd expect a text understanding engine to do more than classify, I'd expect it to read a bunch of sentences in context and then be able to answer questions about it:
John was walking down the stairs. John tripped and fell. John lays on the floor.
Describe John's status: Is he hurt or in pain? Is he standing?
- aab0 10y agoDeep learning can do question-answering.
- nl 10y agoFacebook have one of the leading teams on doing Deep Learning question answering. Jason Weston et. al wrote a paper introducing a machine-generated textual dataset[1] similar to what you describe, eg: Daniel picked up the football. Daniel drops the football. Daniel got the milk. Daniel took the apple. How many objects is Daniel holding? There have been plenty other papers published by them and others tackling that and similar but harder problems eg[2] [1]http://arxiv.org/pdf/1502.05698v10.pdf http://arxiv.org/pdf/1502.05698v10.pdf [2] http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.02301 http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.02301
- pimlottc 10y agoCan't Daniel just type "inventory"?