Although interesting, it read more like scattered excerpts from my undergrad set theory textbook except without symbols. I think its evident by the NYTimes com

Although interesting, it read more like scattered excerpts from my undergrad set theory textbook except without symbols. I think its evident by the NYTimes comments, this probably won't be the easiest article to understand for someone with little background on the topic. The great thing about the books on the subject are they essentially start from nothing.