4 ms·
I have two of these in raid 0 in a Lenovo P70. fahad@heffalump:~/fiotest$ sudo fio --filename=$PWD/testfile --direct=1 --sync=1 --rw=read --bs=4k --numjobs=
by fahadkhan 10y ago
I have two of these in raid 0 in a Lenovo P70.
fahad@heffalump:~/fiotest$ sudo fio --filename=$PWD/testfile --direct=1 --sync=1 --rw=read --bs=4k --numjobs=8 --iodepth=32 --runtime=60 --time_based --group_reporting --size=1G --name=journal-test
journal-test: (g=0): rw=read, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=sync, iodepth=32
...
fio-2.2.10
Starting 8 processes
journal-test: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 1024MB)
Jobs: 8 (f=8): [R(8)] [100.0% done] [367.8MB/0KB/0KB /s] [94.2K/0/0 iops] [eta 00m:00s]
journal-test: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=25184: Wed Jun 1 17:32:44 2016
read : io=22265MB, bw=379986KB/s, iops=94996, runt= 60001msec
clat (usec): min=15, max=19595, avg=83.59, stdev=102.01
lat (usec): min=15, max=19595, avg=83.65, stdev=102.02
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 20], 5.00th=[ 65], 10.00th=[ 66], 20.00th=[ 68],
| 30.00th=[ 75], 40.00th=[ 79], 50.00th=[ 80], 60.00th=[ 82],
| 70.00th=[ 84], 80.00th=[ 90], 90.00th=[ 97], 95.00th=[ 108],
| 99.00th=[ 141], 99.50th=[ 173], 99.90th=[ 900], 99.95th=[ 1704],
| 99.99th=[ 4768]
bw (KB /s): min=43704, max=53976, per=12.51%, avg=47524.23, stdev=1225.35
lat (usec) : 20=0.74%, 50=1.42%, 100=89.28%, 250=8.32%, 500=0.09%
lat (usec) : 750=0.03%, 1000=0.03%
lat (msec) : 2=0.06%, 4=0.02%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%
cpu : usr=1.38%, sys=7.92%, ctx=5737418, majf=0, minf=89
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=5699889/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: io=22265MB, aggrb=379986KB/s, minb=379986KB/s, maxb=379986KB/s, mint=60001msec, maxt=60001msec
- olavgg 10y agoThat is awesome, what do you get with writes? (rw=write)
- nl 10y agoI ran both: https://gist.github.com/nlothian/e22ee30c6ccb8d473058d9e0864d3b13 https://gist.github.com/nlothian/e22ee30c6ccb8d473058d9e0864... Read is a lot (LOT) faster than writes. Enough to make me thing I might have something misconfigurated there(?), although I'm not familiar enough with this benchmark to know for sure.
- jandrese 10y agoIt's not unusual for write performance to be staggeringly worse than read on SSDs. It all depends how the controller is setup and how the manufacturer wants it to benchmark. Most sites emphasize read performance so the companies tune for it.