3 ms·
Right, I'm not disagreeing with that at all. I'm pointing out that a knee-jerk "doesn't work with JS" is irrelevant to 99% of web users. Be there are other co
by abritinthebay 10y ago
Right, I'm not disagreeing with that at all.
I'm pointing out that a knee-jerk "doesn't work with JS" is irrelevant to 99% of web users.
Be there are other considerations of course, like accessibility, UX consistency, etc (all of which ARE doable in JS if you have to) but that's not what I was responding to, was it?