3 ms·

Whenever I use these services they are pretty much never as responsive as a local editor, which is to be expected I guess, but I don't see how this could replac

by zxcvcxz 10y ago

Whenever I use these services they are pretty much never as responsive as a local editor, which is to be expected I guess, but I don't see how this could replace someones dev environment if they're a serious programmer. Big companies are going to want to have a lot more control over the backend and how things are wired together. People just learning will want to know how to actually make things work and not just have their hand held the whole time. For small freelance work this looks like it cold be good, but even then you have to learn the "HyperDev" work flow. I just build and deploy everything in containers using Vim as my editor.

Yahivin 10y ago
There isn't anything special about the HyperDev work flow. You can take any project that runs in HyperDev and `git push heroku master` and have it running on Heroku, or run it locally in a similar manner. HyperDev gives you an environment where you can update and deploy your code without having to set anything up to get started. You can collaborate with anyone by just sending them a link. There will always be a place for more custom environments, but we hope that HyperDev can serve 99% of developers and people who write code on computers.
- jakubp 10y ago
  Hmm. I don't know about serving "99% of developers" without support for at least top 10 languages/frameworks, catering for enterprise (which is, in my country, like 50% or more of all jobs for software devs), and an IDE that has at least the most basic of features... but most of all, I do not feel like the blog post or the site itself communicates in any way the two most important feelings I'd like to get as a developer: 1) I'm in control if I need to be, 2) I understand what's going on. These are of course related, but I have neither the sense that I can control things here, nor that I understand what's so special about this. For working alone my own dev machine is better in every regard with the exception of being able to code away from that machine; for working together I would never let a 3rd party provide glue and choice of architecture, security etc. anyway, since anything bigger would likely be a more serious (not more frivolous) endeavour... what am I not getting?
  - deleted 10y ago
    [deleted]
the_watcher 10y ago
> I don't see how this could replace someones dev environment if they're a serious programmer. Joel explicitly says that it does not.
konnichimade 10y ago
It's not a serious dev environment. It's a playground with zero setup. If you've never even touched node, you can still start writing it and have it run right now.

by zxcvcxz 10y ago

Yahivin 10y ago

There isn't anything special about the HyperDev work flow. You can take any project that runs in HyperDev and `git push heroku master` and have it running on Heroku, or run it locally in a similar manner. HyperDev gives you an environment where you can update and deploy your code without having to set anything up to get started. You can collaborate with anyone by just sending them a link. There will always be a place for more custom environments, but we hope that HyperDev can serve 99% of developers and people who write code on computers.

jakubp 10y ago
Hmm. I don't know about serving "99% of developers" without support for at least top 10 languages/frameworks, catering for enterprise (which is, in my country, like 50% or more of all jobs for software devs), and an IDE that has at least the most basic of features... but most of all, I do not feel like the blog post or the site itself communicates in any way the two most important feelings I'd like to get as a developer: 1) I'm in control if I need to be, 2) I understand what's going on. These are of course related, but I have neither the sense that I can control things here, nor that I understand what's so special about this. For working alone my own dev machine is better in every regard with the exception of being able to code away from that machine; for working together I would never let a 3rd party provide glue and choice of architecture, security etc. anyway, since anything bigger would likely be a more serious (not more frivolous) endeavour... what am I not getting?
- deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]

the_watcher 10y ago

> I don't see how this could replace someones dev environment if they're a serious programmer. Joel explicitly says that it does not.

konnichimade 10y ago

It's not a serious dev environment. It's a playground with zero setup. If you've never even touched node, you can still start writing it and have it run right now.