5 ms·
http://sqlite.org/src4/doc/trunk/www/design.wiki http://sqlite.org/src4/doc/trunk/www/design.wiki offers a good overview of SQLite deisgn, for those who are int
by yarapavan 10y ago
http://sqlite.org/src4/doc/trunk/www/design.wiki http://sqlite.org/src4/doc/trunk/www/design.wiki offers a good overview of SQLite deisgn, for those who are interested.
- sargun 10y agoI thought SQLite4 was dead in the water? There have been no contributions since late 2015. Is there still a plan to maintain it?
- coleifer 10y agoI like to think of it as a thought experiment with some working code attached.
- ronjouch 10y ago> "SQLite4 is an alternative, not a replacement, for SQLite3. SQLite3 is not going away. SQLite3 and SQLite4 will be supported in parallel. The SQLite3 legacy will not be abandoned. SQLite3 will continue to be maintained and improved. But designers of new systems will now have the option to select SQLite4 instead of SQLite3 if desired." In addition to commitment, that's what I call clarity by repetition / reformulation :) . Good to see a writer handling worries about such backward-compatibility-breaking changes in the absolutelytotallymostest explicit way.
- jordanlev 10y agoI listened to a podcast interview with Richard Hipp (the main SQLite developer) recently: http://5by5.tv/changelog/201 http://5by5.tv/changelog/201 It was really good. One of the things he mentioned is how they're planning to support SQLite until 2050 because of an agreement with Airbus (apparently that's the life of one of their recent plane models, and SQLite is used for some aspect of the software). Crazy!
- dfox 10y agoI remember seeing mostly same paragraph 10 years ago, only with 3->2 and 4->3 :)
- vic20forever 10y agoShe knows her audience ;)
- coleifer 10y agosqlite4 is completely different from sqlite3. The design is interesting in its own right but it's for a completely different product.