3 ms·
Wait a minute. Microsoft did something to deceive the users of its "free" Visual Studio? Why this does not surprise me... I can understand why people used Visu
by dragandj 10y ago
Wait a minute. Microsoft did something to deceive the users of its "free" Visual Studio? Why this does not surprise me...
I can understand why people used Visual Studio 20 years ago - decent free alternatives were lacking. But in 2016? And no less than for markdown!
- Hondor 10y agoWhat alternatives are there? Just recently there was a HN story about a great add-on for Emacs that would find the definition of a symbol. That's been in VS for a decade or two but open source editors apparently don't have it. Same goes for renaming things and having them automatically renamed everywhere else. Background compiler that underlines and even corrects your errors as you type - what else does that?
- kuschku 10y agoThe IntelliJ IDEA Open Source edition?
- wtbob 10y ago> Just recently there was a HN story about a great add-on for Emacs that would find the definition of a symbol. That's been in VS for a decade or two but open source editors apparently don't have it. ctags has existed since 1979, which is almost 40 years ago. The thing you read about implements a different way to find definitions.
- hurricaneSlider 10y ago1. It is a third party plugin. 2. VSCode is OSS 3. VSCode != VisualStudio. Conclusion: You clearly dislike Microsoft and hence confirmation bias has lead you to post an inflammatory comment without even reading the article.
- dragandj 10y agoHave you read the comments? Who is the author of that "3-rd party" plugin? No connections with Microsoft?
- ajoy39 10y agoIt would help inform your discussion of the article if you read the first paragraph. A) This is VS Code, not Visual Studio, B) This is a third party open source plugin
- kuschku 10y agoIt’s not third party – the dev is a microsoft employee, managing the VS Code team.