> Specifically, the EFF frequently champions the document Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace "Champions" is used to imply adherence, which is impractica

> Specifically, the EFF frequently champions the document Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace "Champions" is used to imply adherence, which is impractical at this time. In the far future, maybe possible but ultimately an ideal not a concrete goal. If you can't understand that, you end up with this grade school drivel of contrived contradiction. > So which is it? Does the EFF repudiate the law, and want government to avoid regulating cyberspace? > but you really can have only one. Regulation by enforcing noninterference is both, in the letter of the law which is a step closer to the spirit and paves the way. This is blogspam. Whatever.