4 ms·
Perhaps better named "How to win my coding interview." Author goes into the specifics he personally expects from an interview. Since he's not positing these as
by alexandercrohde 10y ago
Perhaps better named "How to win my coding interview."
Author goes into the specifics he personally expects from an interview. Since he's not positing these as universal standards (and rightly not) I'm not sure if this is relevant to anybody other than the people who intend to interview at dev mastery.
- bogomipz 10y agoYeah and the whole thing is a loosely veiled attempt for him to generate subscribers to his email list. Not "winning."
- parennoob 10y agoYes, I don't understand the suggestion for regexes as the correct and optimal way to detect palindromes. I hope this is not the expectation in general.
- verroq 10y agoIt is pretty ironic that palindromes cannot be recognised by regular languages.
- pmiller2 10y agoHah, yes. That's probably the simplest application of the pumping lemma I can think of.
- iSnow 10y ago> I don't understand the suggestion for regexes as the correct and optimal way to detect palindromes That made me pause as well, but he actually doesn't say that. He says a "many will use RegEx as a part of the solution" - typically to strip whitespace and punctuation signs - something like /\W/.
- dimino 10y agoI subscribed to this man's newsletter (literally) because while I realize the skills I can pick up from him aren't going to translate 1:1 to other interviews and jobs, this article resonated with me and what I already know about software strongly enough that I can probably at least get to like 1:.95 or something in that ballpark.
- logfromblammo 10y agoIf there is one thing that could possibly make tech recruiting even worse, it is this: "Did you review the study guide for our interviewing process?" The problem is not that the job candidates are not sufficiently informed about the way specific employers conduct interviews. The problem is that employers have expectations regarding the tech jobs market that start at merely unrealistic and progress beyond a complete schizophrenic break with two extra hits of LSD. We are not re-inventing the tech interview. We are, in the style of Thomas Edison searching for a better incandescent filament, discovering 10000 ways that are worse than the existing standard.