4 ms·
I disagree. The question is actually a basic question to see if someone understands discrete math. It's a cornerstone formula, IMO. Now, if it's the only que
by coreyp_1 10y ago
I disagree. The question is actually a basic question to see if someone understands discrete math. It's a cornerstone formula, IMO.
Now, if it's the only question that you ask, then it's a problem. If it's related to the job, though, then it may be more important than you imagine.
One final note: just because someone might be the right hire in the future doesn't mean that they are the right hire for the present. If the person does not have the needed skills or experience, then they are the wrong hire. In the future, after having acquired the necessary skills and experience, then they may be the perfect person for the job.
- debh 10y agoIn my experience, pure mathematical knowledge just by itself seldom translates into good coding skills. This is after I've TAed Maths, CS and Physics courses for almost 4 years. Typically we have 45 minutes to interview someone and asking a question where one has to derive a mathematical formula using induction/ calculus is not well served to gauge their programming abilities. But I totally agree with you on your last point - just because someone is not a good hire now, does not mean they never will be - that's why even if you don't crack an interview, you can reapply in 6 months time.