I didn't read the full paper, so I could be wrong but... I think its MUCH harder to understand than he gives it credit for. The equation on page 4 is enough to

I didn't read the full paper, so I could be wrong but... I think its MUCH harder to understand than he gives it credit for. The equation on page 4 is enough to confused people, especially with C_H is described as "any homogenisation adjustment that may have been applied to the reported temperature." It does't appear to be doing any high level math, but lots of people don't remember that (x^y)(x^z) = x^(y+z) so its going to be hard to get through a paper like this. That being said, the number of people who could read this and understand it does seem to be much higher than I thought before.