4 ms·
Sadly, the authors of Brainstorm haven't worked much on it since the end of November last year. Currently, I don't see why one would prefer Brainstorm over more
by iverjo 10y ago
Sadly, the authors of Brainstorm haven't worked much on it since the end of November last year. Currently, I don't see why one would prefer Brainstorm over more popular deep learning libraries that are more actively maintained and have more examples, documentation and features.
- fchollet 10y agoIn fact, "Brainstorm" is one of the least used packages among all deep learning libraries. For reference, here is the number of new Github issue tickets created over the past 15 days (2016-05-15 to 2016-05-30): #1: 131 tensorflow/tensorflow #2: 107 fchollet/keras #3: 91 dmlc/mxnet #4: 64 BVLC/caffe #5: 61 Microsoft/CNTK #6: 42 deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j #7: 26 tflearn/tflearn #8: 23 Theano/Theano #9: 16 NVIDIA/DIGITS #10: 10 pfnet/chainer #11: 9 Lasagne/Lasagne #12: 8 torch/torch7 #13: 8 NervanaSystems/neon #14: 6 mila-udem/blocks #15: 1 autumnai/leaf #16: 0 karpathy/convnetjs #17: 0 tensorflow/skflow #18: 0 IDSIA/brainstorm
- dikaiosune 10y agoInteresting that even autumnai/leaf has more activity, as I believe that it's in a state of limbo as the original authors are discontinuing work: https://medium.com/@mjhirn/tensorflow-wins-89b78b29aafb#.cue38w8z5 https://medium.com/@mjhirn/tensorflow-wins-89b78b29aafb#.cue...